<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grudge II &#8211; Boston vs. New York Preview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/</link>
	<description>Boston Blitz - New England&#039;s National Chess Team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:07:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafik</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2170</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2170</guid>
		<description>Good Morning Twice ..

Now I have the game score --Definitely, Fantasy Chess!-- Black&#039;s light square Bishop is still on c8 and his a-pawn is on a7.  As for White the Rook is on d1, and where/when Bh3?! was played?  Also, in Fantasy Chess Bishops can jump over pawns!  My suggestion is bogus because I gave White an extra move?!?  Black to move after 21.Ne4!?::

A) 21.Ne4 c5 22.b3 cb3 23.Qb3 c4 24.Qf3 f5 (24..Bb7?! 25.Qg4+ &amp; Qh5) 25.Qh5 Bb7! [No comp. for the pawn].
B) 21.Ne4 c5 22.b3 cd 23.bc4 (23.Rd4? is no way out ...) f5 24.Nf2. This is probably an improvement; the question is: Can this position be saved?

Good Luck Next Year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning Twice ..</p>
<p>Now I have the game score &#8211;Definitely, Fantasy Chess!&#8211; Black&#8217;s light square Bishop is still on c8 and his a-pawn is on a7.  As for White the Rook is on d1, and where/when Bh3?! was played?  Also, in Fantasy Chess Bishops can jump over pawns!  My suggestion is bogus because I gave White an extra move?!?  Black to move after 21.Ne4!?::</p>
<p>A) 21.Ne4 c5 22.b3 cb3 23.Qb3 c4 24.Qf3 f5 (24..Bb7?! 25.Qg4+ &amp; Qh5) 25.Qh5 Bb7! [No comp. for the pawn].<br />
B) 21.Ne4 c5 22.b3 cd 23.bc4 (23.Rd4? is no way out &#8230;) f5 24.Nf2. This is probably an improvement; the question is: Can this position be saved?</p>
<p>Good Luck Next Year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff "notyetagm" Hall</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2161</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff "notyetagm" Hall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:58:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2161</guid>
		<description>Damn it, we lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn it, we lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rafik</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Rafik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2160</guid>
		<description>Good Morning - Better luck next year! Since I was mainly following the Krasik game and occasionally Eugene&#039;s game; I will make a brief note on Eugene&#039;s game and in particular my suggestion in the following position of [b3] instead I believe [Bh3] - I don&#039;t have the score; and because I have to post this here while I still remember (vaguely remember -How do you guys do it?) the position: W: Kg1;Bg2;Re1;Ne4;Rc1;Qc2;h2;g3;f4;d4;b2;a3
B: Kg8;Be7;Bd7(not sure);Re8;Qc7;Rc8;h7;f6;e6;a5;b5;c6;c4 --Next year you guys should have the games posted here from ICC for those fans who don&#039;t have ICC accounts,but can&#039;t wait for next day to see the score on USCL.  Ok; I mentioned this to Eugene and again when he analyzed with Jorge (well, my candidate moves are worthless it seems! Hey,in Fantasy Chess, amateurs play like GMs! So, I told them I will post it here).  Ok; instead of 1.Bh3?! play 1.b3!? Qb6 2.Qb2 cb3 3.Nc5 And Black has an immobile Queen-side majority. Of course, taking the pawn with 1...Ba3?? or 1...cb3; gives White the advantage ( I believe!)  If there&#039;s no forced tactics by Black, then his position really looks ugly. Anyhow, this looks like a comfortable draw fro White.

Your faithful Blitz Fan: Fantasy Chess GM QueenoNabber LOL.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good Morning &#8211; Better luck next year! Since I was mainly following the Krasik game and occasionally Eugene&#8217;s game; I will make a brief note on Eugene&#8217;s game and in particular my suggestion in the following position of [b3] instead I believe [Bh3] &#8211; I don&#8217;t have the score; and because I have to post this here while I still remember (vaguely remember -How do you guys do it?) the position: W: Kg1;Bg2;Re1;Ne4;Rc1;Qc2;h2;g3;f4;d4;b2;a3<br />
B: Kg8;Be7;Bd7(not sure);Re8;Qc7;Rc8;h7;f6;e6;a5;b5;c6;c4 &#8211;Next year you guys should have the games posted here from ICC for those fans who don&#8217;t have ICC accounts,but can&#8217;t wait for next day to see the score on USCL.  Ok; I mentioned this to Eugene and again when he analyzed with Jorge (well, my candidate moves are worthless it seems! Hey,in Fantasy Chess, amateurs play like GMs! So, I told them I will post it here).  Ok; instead of 1.Bh3?! play 1.b3!? Qb6 2.Qb2 cb3 3.Nc5 And Black has an immobile Queen-side majority. Of course, taking the pawn with 1&#8230;Ba3?? or 1&#8230;cb3; gives White the advantage ( I believe!)  If there&#8217;s no forced tactics by Black, then his position really looks ugly. Anyhow, this looks like a comfortable draw fro White.</p>
<p>Your faithful Blitz Fan: Fantasy Chess GM QueenoNabber LOL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Derek Slater</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2158</link>
		<dc:creator>Derek Slater</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2158</guid>
		<description>You make jokes?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make jokes?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark La Rocca</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2156</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark La Rocca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:58:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2156</guid>
		<description>and I thought nobody got my jokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>and I thought nobody got my jokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pnut</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2154</link>
		<dc:creator>pnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:03:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2154</guid>
		<description>referring to la rocca (i haven&#039;t read much by ginsburg)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>referring to la rocca (i haven&#8217;t read much by ginsburg)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pnut</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2153</link>
		<dc:creator>pnut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 20:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2153</guid>
		<description>Mark is freaking hilarious</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark is freaking hilarious</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Ginsburg</title>
		<link>http://boston-blitz.com/2009/11/grudge-ii/comment-page-1/#comment-2152</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Ginsburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 19:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://boston-blitz.com/?p=1917#comment-2152</guid>
		<description>As befits any rivalry, I expect the opposite of logic to prevail on boards 3 and 4, pretty much undoing any logic achieved by either side on board 1 and 2.  

Thus we have Chaos on Board (in terms of the overall match).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As befits any rivalry, I expect the opposite of logic to prevail on boards 3 and 4, pretty much undoing any logic achieved by either side on board 1 and 2.  </p>
<p>Thus we have Chaos on Board (in terms of the overall match).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

